Labor economics, social policies and policy evaluations

IRES also works on diagnosing the functioning of labor markets, and analyzing the impacts and the design of labor market institutions and of active labor-market policies. In addition we study social and development policies, labor income taxation and social security contributions, the aging problem, social enterprises, non-profit organizations and public policies related to them, and human capital economics.

Research in labor economics, on social policies and evaluation is organized around six main areas: 

  

The faculty members involved are Muriel Dejemeppe, Florian Mayneris, Marthe Nyssens, William Parienté, Vincent Vandenberghe, and Bruno Van der Linden. The team includes many young researchers and collaborators from other universities and institutions.

Muriel Dejemeppe Florian Mayneris Marthe Nyssens William Parienté Vincent Vandenberghe Bruno Van der Linden    

Ten recent selected publications:  

  • Cockx, B. and M. Dejemeppe (2005), "Duration dependence in the exit rate out of unemployment in Belgium. Is it true or spuriousω", The Journal of Applied Econometrics , 20 (1), 1-23. 
  • Debande, O. and V. Vandenberghe (2008), “Refinancing EU's Higher Education with Deferred and Income-Contingent Tuition Fees:An empirical assessment using Belgian, German and UK data”, European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 364-386. 
  • Defourny, J. and Nyssens M. (2008), “Social Enterprise in Europe: Recent Trends and Developments”, Social Enterprise Journal, 4 (3), 202 -228. 
  • Dejemeppe, M. (2005), "A complete decomposition of unemployment dynamics using longitudinal grouped duration data", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67, 1, 47-70. 
  • Cardullo G. and B. Van der Linden (2007, "Employment subsidies and substitutable skills: An equilibrium matching approach",Applied Economics Quarterly 53, 375-404 
  • Hungerbühler, H., E. Lehmann, A. Parmentier and B. Van der Linden (2006), “Optimal income taxation in an equilibrium unemployment model”, Review of Economic Studies 73, 715-739. 
  • Lehmann, E. and B. Van der Linden (2007), “On the optimality of search matching equilibrium when workers are risk averse”, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9, 867-884. 
  • Nyssens, M. (2008), “The Third Sector and the social inclusion agenda: the role of social enterprises in the field of work integration”, in: Stephen P Osborne (ed), The Third Sector in Europe: Trends and Prospects, Routledge: London. 
  • Robin, S. and V. Vandenberghe (2004), “Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: a comparison of methods, Labour Economics, 11, 487-506. 
  • Vandenberghe, V. and F. Watenberg (2007), “What does it take to achieve Equality of Opportunityω An Empirical Evaluation Based on Brazilian Data”, Economics of Education Review, 26, 710-724. 

Unemployment                                                                                                                         

Within the area of unemployment, our first topic of research is the determinants of the unemployment rate and the effectiveness of labor market and training policies. One objective of this project is to evaluate the new monitoring scheme for unemployed benefit claimants in Belgium which was introduced in July 2004. This system was designed to foster job-seeking, the supply of vocational training and other active policy measures. In addition, workers’ efforts to find a job are more closely monitored than before, and sanctions are applied if the efforts are deemed to be insufficient. Recent micro-economic evaluations in other countries have concluded that this type of policy can be effective in stimulating participants’ return to employment. This conclusion is important, given that most active policy measures turn out, when evaluated, only to have weak effects. This research is aimed at seeing whether these conclusions also apply in Belgium. This project is led by Muriel Dejemeppe and Bruno Van der Linden in collaboration with Bart Cockx from Ghent University. It involves five researchers: Sofia Pessoa e Costa, Andrey Launov, Cyriaque Edon, Matteo Picchio, and Fatemeh Shadman-Metha. It benefits from the cooperation of Bruno Crépon (CREST) and Marc Gurgand (PSE and CREST).

The second project relates to the determinants of youth unemployment. Unemployment rates among young people vary dramatically across OECD countries and over time. This project tries to identify the economic forces underpinning these variations. By using OECD labor market aggregate time series it aims to assess the relative importance of (aggregate) labor demand versus (youth) labor supply as determinants of the youth unemployment rate. In particular we evaluate the "lower demographic dividend" hypothesis, according to which the smaller cohorts of young people since the 1980s should translate into lower youth unemployment rates. The second objective is to identify countries where the level and the variability of youth unemployment significantly deviates from that predicted by the overall/adult level of unemployment (a good proxy of the state of the business cycle) and demographic factors. We investigate whether specific institutional arrangements can make a difference to youth unemployment. The existence of such arrangements is a prerequisite for the justification of specific youth employment policies and analyzes of youth unemployment. So far, we have arrived at several conclusions. First, youth unemployment rates since 1980 have been strongly driven by the adult unemployment rate and the overall demand for labor. Second, smaller cohorts since 1980 have translated into lower youth unemployment. Third, some countries seem to be able to achieve better (or worse) in terms of youth unemployment than their overall employment performances and demographics would predict. Vincent Vandenberghe and Thomas Manfredi from the OECD are conducting this project.   


Design and evaluation of labor market institutions                                                               

The first objective in this area is to characterize and evaluate the design of labor market institutions in Belgium. Labor market institutions include formal organizations, laws, rules and policies that affect the functioning of the labor market. This research starts with the question of the extent to which some federal labor market institutions should be decentralized. We argue that some gains can be expected from the appropriate decentralization of some of these institutions. However, to overcome the huge demographic and economic challenges that we currently face, a comprehensive reform of these institutions is much more important. Within the limits of this research we focus on the design of the employment protection legislation (EPL) and of unemployment insurance (UI). The promoters of this project are Bruno Van der Linden and Bart Cockx from Ghent University.

Another concern is the empirical analysis of gendered wage discrimination on the Belgian labor market. This research uses a matched employer/employee dataset to investigate the presence of gender wage discrimination in the private sector. We identify and measure wage discrimination at the firm level, using a labor index decomposition pioneered by Hellerstein and Neumark (1995). This allows us to compare direct estimates of a gender productivity differential with those of a gender labor-cost differential. Using the panel structure of our data we can distinguish gender wage discrimination from within-firm variation. We address the problem of endogeneity in input choice using a structural production function estimator devised by Olley and Pakes. Although subject to important caveats, our results indicate that we cannot reject the null hypothesis that there is no gender wage discrimination on the Belgian labor market. Our findings suggest that other causes of the current gender differences in salaries/wages have to be investigated. This project is led by Vincent Vandenberghe and involves Daniel B. Martins from the OECD.

Another topic in the broad area of labor market participation is self-employment. The IRES is investigating the effects of interventions supporting youth self employment in disadvantaged areas of France. These are areas where youth unemployment is particularly high and young people face significant constraints in terms of human capital, experience, and access to information that keep them from starting their own businesses. The program aims to relax these constraints by developing an entrepreneurship training program. We have developed an experimental design to rigorously identify the effects of the program: some of the eligible young people are randomly encouraged to participate, while others are not. This creates a sufficient participation differential between the two groups to estimate the parameter of interest. A similar research project is being implemented in Morocco. These projects were developed by William Parienté, in collaboration with several other researchers: Bruno Crépon (CREST), Esther Duflo (MIT), Elise Huillery (Sciences PO) and Juliette Seban (PSE).


Our staff is also investigating normative issues related to the labor market. One goal is to analyze the optimal income tax scheme with endogenous participation and search unemployment. The research team studies optimal redistributive taxation when individuals are heterogeneous in their skills and the value they attach to non-market activities. Search/matching frictions on the labor markets create unemployment. Wages, labor demand and participation are endogenous. The government only observes wage levels. Under a “maximin” objective, if the elasticity of participation decreases with the distribution of skills, at the optimum the average tax rate is increasing, and marginal tax rates are positive everywhere, while wages, unemployment rates and participation rates are distorted downwards compared to their laissez-faire values. Under a general utilitarian objective, numerical simulations suggest that the downward distortions of wages and unemployment remain. However, the optimal policy then induces upward distortions in participation. The head of this project is Bruno Van der Linden, working in collaboration with Etienne Lehman (CREST) and Alexis Parmentier (Université d’Evry).

A related topic is optimal marginal tax rates with both extensive and intensive labor supply responses. The literature on nonlinear redistributive taxation assumes that workers can adjust their effort in employment (the intensive margin) while the government can observe their total earnings but not their ability. The optimal marginal tax rates are then non-negative. When participation decisions (the extensive margin) are endogenous and the intensive margin is neglected, the optimal participation tax rates can be negative at the bottom of the earnings distribution. This property provides a rationale for tax systems such as the earned income tax credit. A noteworthy feature of such systems is that the marginal tax rate is negative over some range of earnings. In this project, we assume that both the intensive and the extensive margins are present. Unlike Saez (2002), we assume that there is a continuum of earnings so that the notion of marginal tax rates makes sense. We provide a sufficient condition such that optimal marginal tax rates are non-negative everywhere. This issue is analyzed by Bruno Van der Linden in collaboration with Laurence Jacquet (NHH) and Etienne Lehmann (CREST).

Finally, Bruno Van der Linden, Etienne Lehmann (Crest) and Claudio Lucifora (University of Milan) use empirical tools and panel data to revisit the links between payroll taxation and the level of unemployment. Until now, the literature has mostly considered aggregate indicators of the tax pressure (such as the tax wedge). Our approach is different since it focuses on indicators of the profile of the tax schedule. In non-competitive labor markets, theoretical analyses show that an increase in tax progression (actually, a decline in the coefficient of residual income progress) leads to wage moderation and eventually to a decline in unemployment.


Economics of education                                                                                                           


In this area, we deal with the determinants of human capital investments and the evaluation of public education. The first objective is to evaluate the 2001 education reform of the Belgian French-Speaking Community. We have quantified the effects of grade retention on attainment by means of a reform introduced in 2001, whereby the possibility of grade retention in Grade 7 was reintroduced. We used the Synthetic Control Method to identify the best possible control methods. Data come from three waves of the PISA study, covering periods before and after the reform, that contain test scores for representative samples of 15 year-olds. These are used to answer two questions. First, has the 2001 grade repetition reform at least succeeded at filtering out weaker pupils, who would presumably be disadvantaged by being promoted directly to higher gradesω This is a minimum condition for grade retention to be applicable. Second, do these “treated” students achieve better or worse when they repeat (and are therefore in a lower grade at age 15) than when they are “socially promoted” (and reach the Grade 10 when they are 15)ω We have found significant evidence of positive screening, but we have failed to demonstrate that those filtered out perform differently under the “grade repetition” regime than under the “social promotion” regime. This project is being conducted by Vincent Vandenberghe and Michèle Bélot (Nuffield College, Oxford).


We are also exploring new funding mechanisms for higher education in the European Union, by investigating the possibility of relying on income-contingent tuition fees. The arguments for raising tuition fees in Europe largely rest on preserving the profitability of educational investments and offering deferred and income-contingent payments. We are using income survey datasets from Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom to estimate how graduates’ private return on educational investment is affected by higher private contributions. The effect of income-contingent and deferred payment mechanisms on lifetime net incomes and their capacity to account for graduates’ ability to pay, are evaluated by considering numerous ways of financing the cost of introducing income-contingency. Our analysis reveals that increasing individuals’ contributions to higher education costs, through income-contingent and deferred instruments, does not significantly affect the private rate of return of heterogeneous graduates. It allows for payments to be indexed to the ability to pay, and can be implemented in ways that minimize the risk of adverse selection. These findings prove robust to significant variations between countries’ diverse higher education institutional structures. This project is run by Vincent Vandenberghe and Olivier Debande (EIB).


Another topic is the empirical study of the impact of family income on enrolment in tertiary education across EU countries. There is plenty of evidence across the EU suggesting that young people from poorer backgrounds are less likely to undertake tertiary education than their better-off peers. This correlation is often used to justify monetary transfers to families with students. It is not clear, however, that these differences in attendance are caused by income itself rather than by parental ability, motivation, education, and other aspects of young people’s experience that differ between families, but are not a direct result of income. Controlling for observable family characteristics is a useful step. But further developments are needed as families potentially differ in unobservable characteristics that are correlated with both income and enrolment in tertiary education. We consider families with several children to correct for unobserved time-invariant family fixed effects.  The results suggest the absence of parental income effects in Belgium and Germany, small positive effects in Poland, medium-sized positive effects in the UK, and sizeable positive effects in Hungary. The project is led by Vincent Vandenberghe and involves one researcher, Karasiotou Pavlina.  


Non-profit organizations and public policies                                                                         

The three projects in the area of non-profit organizations and public policy are supervised by Marthe Nyssens and involve researchers from CIRTES (Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Travail et Société – Interdisciplinary Center for Research on Work and Society, UCL).

The first study concerns the provision of care services in European countries in a comparative perspective. In the context of the crisis in the Welfare State and massive unemployment, “proximity services” are often presented in the policy debates of European countries as a solution to two major challenges: they meet the growing demand for personal and social services generated by demographic, social and family changes; and they generate job opportunities particularly adapted for the low-skilled unemployed. The provision of care services is characterized by a plurality of providers: public, cooperative, non-profit, social enterprises as well as private for-profit organizations. The objective of this study is to achieve a better understanding of the way the in which the provision of care services is organized, so as to define the broad lines of a public intervention to support their development.

A related project concerns social enterprise, defined by the EMES European Research Network as an initiative from a citizens’ group that combines a dimension of service with widening and opening to the community. There is a high degree of autonomy and economic risk linked to private activities of production. The concepts of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship are making amazing breakthroughs in EU countries and the United States. The debates on the two sides of the Atlantic have taken place in parallel, with few connections between them. Our recent research analyzes how the various conceptualizations have evolved and investigates the reasons for the conceptual convergences and divergences among regions as well as within the US and Europe.

The third issue relates to the organization of civil society in the “South”. Since 2004, we have been part of the GRAP (Groupe de Recherche sur l’Action Publique — Research Group in Support of Development Co-operation Policies) research project, supported by the CUD (Commission Universitaire pour le Développement – University Commission for Development) and the Belgian Development Cooperation (DGDC). This project is concerned with the role of civil society organizations in the fight against poverty, in particular in the sectors of education, microfinance and health micro-insurance in sub-Saharan Africa. Our team is participating in the project on microfinance and health micro-insurance. Our first goal is to analyze the extent to which the actions of civil society organizations can improve the access of the poorest to these services. In a second stage, the researchers will analyze the ways in which supporting civil society organizations might improve the regulation of the health and microfinance sectors.   

 


Social policies, poverty and development                                                                             

In the field of social policies, poverty and development, we are studying the microeconomic determinants of poverty in developing countries and using field experiments to analyze the effectiveness of specific development policies. Access to credit, human capital, and basic infrastructure is often limited in poor areas. Two research projects are focusing on the effects of relaxing credit constraints in poor rural areas of Morocco and Pakistan. Financial services are essential for many reasons, including the accumulation of physical and human capital, and for smoothing consumption in the absence of insurance markets. Lack of access to credit may therefore have significant consequences on the economic productivity and mobility of households. The project is exploring the effect of interventions to improve access to credit on households’ production, income, consumption and food security. We are also looking at externalities affecting populations that are do not benefit directly from these policies. The two projects are led by William Parienté, in collaboration with Bruno Crépon (CREST), Esther Duflo (MIT) and Florencia Devoto (PSE) for Morocco, and with Dean Karlan (Yale) for Pakistan.

In a related project, we are studying the demand for, and the effect of, private access to water on health, time use, social integration and well-being among households in urban Morocco. The private and public returns of policies that are promoting access to water at home are compared to evaluate whether or not they should be subsidized. This research is being undertaken by William Parienté in collaboration with Esther Duflo (MIT), Pascaline Dupas (UCLA), Vincent Pons (MIT) and Florencia Devoto (PSE). 


Local development policies

Many development policies are implemented within developed countries, to help lagging regions catch-up or to promote the competitiveness of particular industries through geographically targeted measures.

One example of this approach is cluster policies, which try to generate and enhance relationships between firms in the same sector located in the same region. These increased collaborations between geographically proximate firms are expected to facilitate, among other things, the circulation of ideas, the exploitation of technological complementarities, and the optimization of input purchasing. These are all factors that may improve firm-level performance (productivity, exports etc.)  Many countries or regions, such as the Spanish Basque Country, Germany, Southern Korea, Brazil, UK, France or Belgium, have implemented development strategies based on cluster policies over the last twenty years. However, such policies are advocated both by supporters of regional policies to favor lagging areas, and by exponents of competitiveness policies focused on national leaders. They therefore suffer from considerable ambiguity between equity and efficiency considerations, and their implementation can be highly varied. Ex-ante and ex-post evaluations of these policies are needed to understand their determinants and their impact. We are focusing on the situation in France, by evaluating two different French cluster policies, the Local Productive Systems and the Competitiveness Clusters policies. This research is led by Florian Mayneris, in collaboration with Philippe Martin (Sciences-Po) and Thierry Mayer (Sciences-Po) on the one hand, and Pamina Koenig (Paris School of Economic), Lionel Fontagné (Paris School of Economic) and Sandra Poncet (Paris 11) on the other.

Some other policies target deprived city areas directly. These areas often experience low levels of education, high levels of unemployment and poverty, damaged housing and security issues, which, cumulatively, lower their attractiveness considerably. In order to break this vicious circle, some policies are aimed at attracting economic activities to these places through geographically targeted incentives. In France, for example, tax and social-contribution exemptions are offered to firms that relocate to the deprived urban areas targeted by the government. First evaluations of these policies in developed countries have generally yielded mixed results. When an effect is detected on the number of workplaces created, it is often quite weak; moreover, some studies show that the unemployment of local residents does not necessarily decrease when workplaces are created in these areas The French Ministry of Labor and Solidarity has decided to evaluate the various measures taken in France since the mid 1990s. Florian Mayneris is participating in this evaluation, with a team of researchers from Sciences-Po comprising Clément Malgouyres, Thierry Mayer, Loriane Py and Etienne Wasmer. Three specific issues will be investigated in more detail:

  • the apparent heterogeneity of the impact of tax exemptions on firms’ location decisions, and its links to firm-level characteristics (size, productivity, sector etc.) and area-specific characteristics (potential agglomeration externalities in urban areas, demographic characteristics etc.).
  • the quality of the jobs created, along a variety of dimensions such as average wage, length of contract, danger, etc.
  •  the impact of geographically targeted incentives (e.g. tax and social-contribution exemptions) on land prices.

 

 

 

 

| 7/09/2011 |