Stages in the doctoral process

Pre-Admission
Admission
Confirmation
Doctoral Defense
Joint programmes with institutions outside the Academie 
Appeal Process

Doctoral process

The doctoral process contains four or five stages: the optional pre-admission, the admission, the confirmation, the private defense and the public defense. Note that admission (pre-admission or permanent) is necessary to undertake activities in the doctoral programme, credit is not awarded for activities prior to admission (pre-admission). This chapter is devoted to describing these stages in some detail from a process viewpoint. 

Pre-Admission

The pre-admission is an optional step, primarily intended to allow for qualified candidates to define their project and supervisor, while pursuing courses and integrating in the doctoral programme. Below we review the objectives, application process and appeal provision for this step.

Objective

The optional pre-admission stage (DR art 2.1) is intended to provide the candidate with the necessary time to accomplish the administrative, financial and social stages involved in the integration in a research environment (e.g., the application for scholarships, the organisation of project funding, receipt of visa and work permits if applicable). The decision to pre-admit a candidate is made by the LSM Doctoral Bureau. A pre-admission is valid for at most 12 calendar months and authorizes the candidate to

  • Define and prepare a thesis proposal under the guidance of the [temporary] supervisor (mentor);
  • Define and propose a programme for individual research training in collaboration with the [temporary] supervisor. Credits are awarded for courses and reading seminars during the period of pre-admission;
  • Identify and establish a scientific collaboration with the [permanent] supervisor, including the necessary contacts to propose a supervisory panel.

Process

An application for pre-admission can be made any time and should be made on a specific form to the local LSM Doctoral Bureau member for a site in the Académie where the temporary supervisor (mentor) is active. The LSM Doctoral Bureau member can act as a source of information to find a potential supervisor unless such contacts are already taken. The pre-admission process contains two stages (i) application for pre-admission to the coordinator, and (ii) administrative registration at the local institution within the Académie.

Pre-admission application

The pre-admission application file must contain the following information:

  • Identity, full name (copies of identity card and/or passport)
  • Contact information (address, telephone and email)
  • CV and copies of obtained university degrees
  • Research field intended
  • Letter of support from an LSM faculty member volunteering to act as temporary supervisor (mentor) during the pre-admission phase.

The LSM Doctoral Bureau validates the information in the application with respect to admissibility as a PhD student and writes a decision (accept/reject) that is sent to the candidate and the local doctoral administration. 

Pre-admission administrative registration

Following the approval by the local LSM Doctoral Bureau member, the candidate will receive an authorization to register as a doctoral student in pre-admission for up to 12 months. The candidate registers locally at the institution (contact information in Table 4) and pays the annual administrative fees that are due. Note that no tuition is payable for pre-admission.

Campus
Contact
Institution
Email
Mons
Sandrine DELHAYE
FUCaM

Admission

The admission to the doctoral school constitutes the first mandatory step in the doctoral process. The admission application is to be sent to the LSM Doctoral Bureau through its administrator (sandrine.delhaye@fucam.ac.be) in electronic format (PDF, preferably in a single file).

Admission application

The following elements must be contained in the electronic admission file (documents marked by * may be omitted for candidates already pre-admitted).

  1. Identity, full name (scanned copies of identity card and/or passport)*
  2. Contact information (address, telephone and email)*
  3. CV and copies of obtained university degrees*
  4. Proof of completion of Master’s degree in management (alt. M.Sc. in management) 120 ECTS with honors or equivalent, terminating undergraduate and graduate university studies of at least 300 ECTS. A student with a Master’s degree 120 ECTS obtained with honors or equivalent in a different field may be granted access after validating up to 60 ECTS of graduate coursework in management or equivalent.
  5. Documentation showing proficiency in English (a level of 550 of TOEFL or equivalent may be required).
  6.  Letter of support from a LSM faculty member to act as [permanent] supervisor
  7. Research proposal
  8. Proposal for supervisor panel
  9. Proposal for a research training programme of 24+18 ECTS
The supervisor

An LSM senior faculty member (professor or permanent scientist) with a doctoral degree obtained after the public defense of a thesis is eligible to supervise doctoral research within a given scientific domain. A thesis may be supervised by two faculty members (co-supervision), provided both are eligible to supervise doctoral students and that at least one is a faculty member in the Académie. A retired faculty member (emeritus) may continue supervision for already admitted candidates, but cannot act as supervisor for a new candidate. The thesis supervisor(s) must write and sign a Letter of Support to confirm the commitment to supervise the proposed candidate and project until completion. Without a Letter of Support from an eligible supervisor in the file, the application will be rejected by default. 

The research proposal

The research proposal is a document edited in English or French (using the form to download ), 5-7 pages long with the following contents:

  1. Tentative thesis title
  2. Summary of the objective or research questions for the project, including a statement of the motivation and originality of the chosen topic within the field of management.
  3. Short state-of-the-art literature review for recent work related to the proposed project.
  4. Methodological statement sufficiently detailed to enable an assessment of its relevance with respect to the stated research questions.
  5. Scientific bibliography
  6. Tentative project plan outlining human, material and financial resources necessary to complete the project.

Projects that are insufficiently specified, too ambitious or inadequate in terms of methodology or literature are rejected.

The supervisor panel

The supervisory panel is proposed by the supervisor(s) and contains at least two other eligible faculty members, whereof at least one member is external to the research group of the supervisor(s). The voluntary members of the thesis committee are committed to provide continuous guidance to the candidate during the project, meeting at least once annually with the supervisor(s) and the candidate to discuss the progress. The prior contentment of the proposed members to serve on the supervisor panel must be solicited by the supervisor. The LSM Doctoral Bureau may approve the proposal or change the composition of the supervisory panel to better suit the project and candidate.        

The research training programme

The proposal for the training programme is elaborated jointly by the candidate, the supervisor(s) and the supervisory panel with the objective to conceive a package that is tailor-made for the scientific needs of the candidate and the project. The part necessary to be specified in the admission folder concerns the courses (24 ECTS) and the identity of the chosen DSM reading seminar (18 ECTS).

Application contact and deadlines

The electronic application file is to be sent by email to the LSM Doctoral Bureau through its administrator (see above) with a copy to the local LSM Doctoral Bureau member (if the candidate is pre-admitted).
The LSM Doctoral Bureau reviews the admission applications monthly, candidates can inquire to the Bureau secretary for the dates of the upcoming meetings. Regular deadlines for registration per academic year apply.  

Process

The LSM Doctoral Bureau reviews the admission applications continuously. An acceptance decision of the LSM Doctoral Bureau is sent to

  • The Candidate
  • The Supervisor(s)
  • The Members of supervisory panel
  • The CDD Economics and Management (for information)
In the case of a rejected admission, a motivated decision of the LSM Doctoral Bureau is sent to
  • The Candidate
  • The Supervisor(s)

The LSM Doctoral Bureau may judge that the application should be improved in order for the Bureau to come to a positive decision and ask the candidate to submit an updated version.

Administrative registration

Following the approval by the LSM Doctoral Bureau, the candidate will receive an authorization to register as a PhD student. The candidate registers locally at the institution of his/her supervisor and pays tuition as well as the annual registration fees that are due. For successive registrations up until the academic year for the final thesis defense, the candidate must pay the annual registration fees prior to Dec 1 each year to stay in the programme.

Confirmation

The confirmation procedure is a mandatory intermediate step in the doctoral process with the purpose to assure adequate progress towards the thesis defense in order to meet the statutory objectives in terms of time and quality. The confirmation serves several objectives.
 
First, the confirmation is the critical stage where the candidate has to convince his/her supervisory panel about the prospects of terminating the thesis as initiated. In passing the confirmation, candidate gets an endorsement from the supervisory panel to continue the research along the undertaken direction until the private defense (at least one year later). 

Second, the confirmation is the occasion for the supervisory panel to more precisely fix objectives and limitations for the candidate and the project, given the intermediate results from the 1-2 years of research. These guidelines are important to focus the final work at fruitful areas for scientific contributions, opportunities for publication and/or data availability. 

Third, the progress and status at the confirmation allows the supervisory panel to identify and isolate potential barriers for the candidate in the realization of the project. These barriers could be both linked to material resources (access to financial resources, tools and proprietary data) and human resources (personal capacity of the candidate to master parts of the methodology, supervisory capacity, international connections, etc). The guidelines from the confirmation should address any potential barriers identified as to ensure that the objectives can be achieved in due time with highest quality.

Deadline

Within 24 calendar months from the definitive admission to the doctoral programme by the LSM Doctoral Bureau, the candidate should pass the confirmation stage. The LSM Doctoral Bureau may extend the delay if justified with exceptional circumstances. Note that for FNRS fellowships, the renewal report after two-years requires a passed confirmation stage.

Process

The confirmation step is organized between the candidate and the supervisory panel at a time and

site ofmutual agreement and involves several elements:
  1. Two months prior to the intended confirmation date, the candidate or the supervisor informs the LSM Doctoral Bureau (administration) about the upcoming event. The request is accompanied by the following information:
    • Updated sheet of passed courses etc in the Planned research training
    • List of planned courses etc of the Planned research training
    • Updated sheet of achieved Continuous research activities
    • List of scientific publications
    • List of presentations at scientific conferences
  1. The candidate or supervisor may request the presence of a member of the LSM Doctoral Bureau at the confirmation. Analogously, the LSM Doctoral Bureau may signal their intention to assist at the confirmation. In both cases, the LSM Doctoral Bureau will coordinate with the supervisory panel as to find a suitable date for the confirmation.
  2. Unless a request has been made as of (2), the supervisor informs the LSM Doctoral Bureau about the date of the confirmation.
  3. Two weeks prior to the confirmation, the candidate submits the confirmation report, a written report or authored article(s), showing progress in the research project. Minimum requirement would be to have terminated a thorough literature review and specified the methodological basis for the work. If an article (presented or submitted/published) is submitted, a short written note should document the position of the article in the thesis proposal and the plan for future work.
  4. At the confirmation, an oral presentation (20 minutes) of completed and future work in the doctoral project.
  5. After presentation and discussion, the supervisory panel and possible members of the LSM Doctoral Bureau deliberates upon the conclusions of the confirmation.
  6. The report from the confirmation is written by the member of the LSM Doctoral Bureau, if present as of (2), or by the supervisor and signed by all members of the supervisory panel.
The report is submitted in original to LSM Doctoral Bureau (administrator). The LSM Doctoral Bureau validates the confirmation report and disseminates the result of the confirmation to
  • The Candidate
  • The Members of supervisory panel
  • The CDD Economics and Management (for validation)
In the event of failure (DR art 2.3.3), the LSM Doctoral Bureau can define a period of maximum 12 months within which the candidate may retry the confirmation.

When the supervisory panel considers that the candidate’s work and doctoral research training have been satisfactorily completed, it proposes a composition of a doctoral jury (DR art 2.4.1). The private defense can be done earliest one year after the passed confirmation. 

Doctorat jury

A doctoral jury includes the thesis supervisor(s) and at least three other members selected for their scientific competence in the field of the thesis. At least two of the jury members should be external to LSM, thereof at least one external to the Académie, and all members should possess a doctoral title earned through a public defense of a thesis or equivalent expertise. Normally, the members of the supervisory panel form part of the jury, exceptions to this rule should be validated with the LSM Doctoral Bureau prior to submission of the proposal. 

The jury is chaired by the Dean of the faculty or a delegate, who is not counted as one of the members in sense of the paragraph above. In practice, the local LSM Doctoral Bureau member will chair the jury for the LSM doctoral candidates.

Process for the designation of a jury

The written and signed proposal by the promotor on behalf of the supervisor panel is to be sent to the LSM Doctoral Bureau for validation. After validation of the status of the confirmation, the valid registration of the candidate in the institution, full payment of fees, and the full documentation of the completed doctoral training programme of 60 ECTS, the LSM Doctoral Bureau transmits the proposal to CDD Economics and Management. After approval by the CDD Economics and Management, the proposal is transmitted to the Dean of the faculty concerned by the LSM Doctoral Bureau. The members of the jury are (formally) appointed by the Rector of the university concerned.

Upon receipt of the designation of the jury, the LSM Doctoral Bureau transmits a copy to :
  • The Candidate
  • The Supervisor(s)
  • The Members of the jury
The administrative requirement for the minimum time between the date of the appointment of the jury by the Rector and the date of the private defense is defined by the member institutions in the Académie. E.g., at UCL, the requirement is to allow six weeks between the appointment of the jury and the private defense. 

 

The private doctoral defense (DR art 2.4.2.)

The jury comes to a joint decision on the date of the private defense, in agreement with the candidate. One month at the latest before the chosen date, the candidate forwards the provisional text of the thesis to the jury members; this text must consist of either an original thesis, or an essay accompanied by a coherent set of publications and work of which the candidate is either the author or the co-author. These documents can be submitted in French or in English.

The entire jury should be present for the private defense (videoconference is authorized). If this is not possible for some reason, the absent member must send a written report before the defense to the chairman of the jury, giving his/her reasoned opinion on the value of the thesis and a list of the questions to be put to the candidate.
The private defense will start with a short oral presentation (30 min), the jury will then discuss the text submitted as well as the research results with the candidate.
At the end of the private defense, the jury deliberates and comes to a conclusion about the admissibility of the thesis. The chairman of the jury documents the following decisions at the defense:
 
Form for the defense, signed by all present members declaring
  • Acceptance or not of the admissibility of the thesis.
  • If found non-admissible, a minimum delay in months from the date of the defense for the organisation of a new private defense.
  • If admissible, a summary of necessary modifications prior to publishing the thesis and the public defense
  • Expected time to implement the modifications specified under (c), at most three months. For longer delays, a new private defense has to be organised.
  • Possible delegation of the approval procedure for the resubmitted thesis after modifications in (c), either supervisor(s), supervisory panel or jury.
  • Approximate date for the public defense, no earlier than one month after the private defense.
The result of this deliberation is communicated orally immediately to the candidate and the written form is forwarded to the LSM Doctoral Bureau for validation and the compilation of an official transcript of the defense. This transcript is transmitted to:
  • The Candidate
  • The Supervisor(s)
  • The Members of the jury
  • The CDD Economics and Management

Process prior to the public defense 

The candidate prepares the new thesis draft along with a short document summarizing the implementation of the changes decided, resubmits it to those charged with the approval of the changes. Once the modifications decided in art 3.4.3c above are approved and a final date has been agreed among the members of the jury, the approving party transmits a written demand to the LSM Doctoral Bureau to organize a public defense at that date. The LSM Doctoral Bureau transmits this request to the concerned university administration and invites the jury and the public to the public defense.

The candidate prints the approved thesis version in the series of doctoral theses Académie Louvain/LSM and transmits the printed thesis at least two weeks prior to the defense to
  • Members of the jury
  • LSM Doctoral Bureau
An electronic copy must also be sent to the person responsible for electronic theses within the Académie member institution which will award the degree (DR art 2.5.2). The procedure for submission is detailed in "La gestion academique et administrative du doctorat au sein de l'Academie Universitaire Louvain, Annexe 4, Thèses électroniques : document à destination des gestionnaires de doctorates,approved by CODAL Feb 18, 2008 ".
 
The public doctoral defense (DR art 2.5.1.)

The public defense consists of an oral presentation given by the candidate of the results of the research work which have led to the thesis; on this occasion the candidate should lay emphasis on the qualities and originality of the work, and its relevance to the wider scientific public. This presentation is followed by a discussion between the candidate and the jury and then with everyone present at the defense.

At least two thirds of the members of jury should be present at the public defense, which may not last longer than three hours. Any member unable to attend the public defense must send a written report before the sitting, giving his/her reasoned opinion on questions that he/she wishes to put to the candidate to the chairman of the jury.  

Administrative process after public defense

Immediately after the public defense, the jury members withdraw to decide on the outcome of the doctoral programme, awarding the 120 ECTS for the successful defense of the doctoral dissertation, and to certify that the candidate has obtained the minimum 180 credits required for the granting of the academic title of doctor (DR art 2.5.3). A member of the jury is designated to act as Secretary for the deliberation. The chairman of the jury prepares the following documents to be issued after the deliberation:

  1. Degree certificate for the Académie with signatures of all present members of the jury and the Secretary.
  2. Official report for the defense, reproducing the composition of the jury, the dates and results of the private defense and summarizing the contributions of the thesis on one page, co-signed by all present members of the jury
  3. Official grade report (bulletin) of the doctoral programme with list of all validated elements, signed by the chairman of the LSM Doctoral Bureau.

The chairman announces the result in public and the new doctor signs the degree certificate. The chairman then transmits the degree certificate to the Rector of the concerned university for signature. The official report and the official bulletin are transmitted to the LSM Doctoral Bureau for further dissemination to the Dean of the concerned faculty and CDD Economics and Management.
The LSM Doctoral Bureau (sandrine.delhaye@fucam.ac.be) archives a copy of the official report and the bulletin and transmits documents to:

  • The Dean of the concerned faculty (original official report)
  • The CDD Economics and Management (copy)

The degree certificate

The degree certificate specifies the name of the awarding institution and the Académie Louvain (DR art 3.1), it is also accompanied with a supplement in accordance with art 82 of the Decree (March 31, 2004).

Joint programmes with institutions outside the Academie

A doctoral candidate may be subject to an agreement with a university outside the Académie. In such case, the model agreement with the external university should conform to the model agreement in DR appendix 1 of the "Règlement doctoral de l'Académie universitaire'Louvain ". Prior to signature by the Rector of the concerned universities, the proposed agreement should be validated by CDD Economics and Management, LSM Doctoral Bureau and the Dean of the faculty.

Appeal process

Any decision (pre-admission, admission, confirmation) made by the LSM Doctoral Bureau may be appealed to the CDD Economics and Management. CDD Economics and Management may also resolve conflicts between candidates, supervisors and supervisor panels when necessary. Appeals for admission should be done within three months of the date of rejection and may be subject to additional information requirements and/or an oral presentation, depending on the reasons for reject.

Decisions by the CDD Economics and Management may be appealed to CODAL, the interdisciplinary doctoral commission for the Académie.

 

| 10/11/2010 |