Discussion Papers

CORE publishes a Discussion Papers series. Articles submitted to the series undergo an internal refereeing process. (How to submit)

• CORE DP 2013:
  CORE Discussion Paper 2013 - List of abstract 2013

• Archives:
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2012 / List abstract 2012
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2011 / List abstracts 2011
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2010 / List abstracts 2010
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2009 / List abstracts 2009
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2008 / List abstracts 2008
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2007 / List abstracts 2007
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2006 / List abstracts 2006
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2005 / List abstracts 2005
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2004 / List abstracts 2004
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2003 / List abstracts 2003
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2002 / List abstracts 2002
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2001 / List abstracts 2001
  List CORE Discussion Paper 2000 / List abstracts 2000
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1999 / List abstracts 1999
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1998 / List abstracts 1998
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1997 / List abstracts 1997
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1996
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1995
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1994
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1993
  List CORE Discussion Paper 1992
   
• Old and recent CORE Discussion Papers are available upon request .
  
  

How to submit a CORE Discussion Paper

CORE publishes a Discussion Paper series to which you are invited to submit papers written during your stay at CORE. Articles undergo an internal refereeing process under the responsibility of the Research Director. Papers are submitted via Francisco Santana Ferra. You are welcome to suggest the name of a referee. The refereeing process is mostly informal and hopefully consists in an open discussion between the author and the referee. Final decisions are made by the Research Director on recommendation of the referee. PDF FILES MUST INCLUDE ALL FONTS AND SHOULD NOT REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL FILES FOR THE FIGURES.

If you wish to be present on the Web with your discussion paper you have to follow the procedure described below:
- Your paper must be prepared in the style of a CORE DP;
- This style requires a page containing the title, order number, abstract, keywords, classification, acknowledgements;
- You have to start your paper on the second page;
- There are no rules for the rest of the paper.

a) When your paper is ready, submit it for review with a suggested referee name via .

b)  After acceptation of your paper as a CORE DP, and only when the final version is ready, ask to give you the CORE DP number of the paper.

c)  When your "final+DP number" version is ready, you should provide to Sylvie Mauroy an electronic version of it, by (pdf), and original text file (including all related files: figures, macros...)

Golden rules for a good scientific signature of your publications:

- correct affiliation for CORE member:
  Université catholique de Louvain, CORE, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
- correct affiliation for non-UCL but CORE member and who have several affiliations:
  University1, Department1, B-xxx, Town, Belgium; University2, Department 2, F-xxx, Town, France; etc...

Note that the comma is used as separator with the various fields of the signature
and that the semicolon is used as separator between the various affiliations.

Before or even after you leave CORE, let us know whether your papers will be or have been submitted to a journal and which one. If accepted, remember to send the purchase order form for reprints so that your article can be included in our reprint series, our policy being to accept in this series all papers written by members or visitors during their stay at CORE.