News
Business & Society Research Seminar 2026
Responsibility under Pressure: Sustainability & Inclusion in times of polarization and backlash
We are living in an era of intersecting crises (ecological, social, political, and economic) that increasingly reinforce one another. Societies face accelerating climate breakdown, biodiversity loss, resource scarcity, geopolitical tension, social inequalities, polarization, and rapid technological disruption. These crises reshape the expectations placed on organizations and intensify debates about their broader societal responsibilities.
In this turbulent context, organizational commitments to sustainability, inclusion, and societal impact come under pressure. What was long viewed as a moral and collective imperative is increasingly reframed in instrumental or strategic terms. As public scepticism rises and polarization deepens, efforts related to sustainability and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) risk being deprioritized, diluted, or contested. This creates a pressing paradox: the need for responsible and inclusive organizational action has never been greater, yet its moral legitimacy appears increasingly fragile.
This seminar invites participants to explore how organizations, and the people within them, can continue to create meaningful societal value despite growing resistance, ambiguity, and competing demands. We aim to understand how responsibility is interpreted, practiced, challenged, or defended across different levels of analysis: from individual motivation and identity work, to organizational strategies and leadership, to shifting institutional norms and societal expectations.
By bringing together emerging and established scholars, the seminar seeks to foster dialogue on how sustainability and inclusion can remain credible, resilient, and transformative in an age of crisis, and what this means for research, practice, and the evolving relationship between business and society.
We welcome contributions from various organization-related research fields (e.g., business ethics and philosophy, management and organization studies, strategy, marketing, accounting, finance, entrepreneurship, and sociology) and research methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, mixed, and conceptual). Potential topics may include, but are not limited to:
How can organizations effectively involve internal and external stakeholders in co-creating solutions that advance social, environmental, and ethical objectives?
What role can social movements play in shaping organizational responsibility and fostering systemic societal change?
How can social entrepreneurship initiatives be designed and scaled to generate both organizational resilience and measurable societal impact?
How can business-nonprofit partnerships be structured to maximize shared value and long-term social and environmental outcomes?
How can organizations maintain CSR and DEI initiatives during times of deprioritization?
How can circular economy and sharing economy principles be integrated into business models and governance to support sustainable practices?
What leadership, governance, and decision-making approaches enable organizations to embed corporate social responsibility at the core of strategy in turbulent contexts?
This seminar is specifically designed for PhD students and early-career scholars conducting research in various research fields related to Business and Society. While the specific theme of this year is "Responsibility under Pressure: Sustainability & Inclusion in times of polarization and backlash", all work addressing Business and Society topics can be submitted to the Research Seminar.
More info
Reading seminar in Critical Management Studies
LDSM3531 - Reading Seminar in Critical Management Studies
5 ECTS
Profs. Julie Hermans, Amélie Jacquemin, Maxence Postaire, Laurent Taskin
Academic year 2025-2026
Main objectives
The reading seminar aims primarily to introduce Critical Management Studies (CMS) and assist doctoral students in the construction and development of their doctoral research—especially in its critical stance. It provides a collective discussion and proposals around five core propositions of CMS: De-naturalization, Anti-performativity, Reflexivity, Challenging Structures of Domination, Multidisciplinary Research. Our intention is to better equip doctoral students in terms of methods and theoretical assumptions by discussing their own research design at the prism of the five core propositions.
The five core propositions of CMS
1. De-naturalization: CMS challenges the assumption that current management practices are natural or inevitable. It problematizes the idea that social and organizational behaviors are fixed, asserting that they are contingent and shaped by struggles over power and resources. CMS aims to reveal the precarious nature of these practices.
2. Anti-performativity: CMS critiques the mainstream focus on performativity, which prioritizes efficiency and profitability over ethical or political concerns. It argues that people and organizational processes should not be solely evaluated based on their contribution to business performance, advocating for a broader understanding of the value of work and management.
3. Reflexivity: CMS emphasizes the need for scholars and researchers to be aware of how their own contexts and power structures influence their work. Reflexivity involves recognizing that no research or organizational account is neutral, challenging the objectivism and scientism of mainstream management research.
4. Challenging Structures of Domination: CMS is committed to exposing how knowledge and power are intertwined. It seeks to reveal how supposedly neutral forms of knowledge often reinforce existing power relations, thereby perpetuating domination. CMS promotes the idea that such knowledge is not immutable but subject to contestation and change.
5. Multidisciplinary Research: CMS encourages breaking down disciplinary silos and engaging in dialogues across fields. It believes that critical understanding is enriched by integrating diverse perspectives, fostering deeper questioning of taken-for-granted assumptions in management studies.
The seminar will broaden the perspective and pose topical issues on management research. With the aid of critical theories, the seminar will help participants to understand how environmental and social concerns are framed, and how the roles of actors in the CMS agenda are defined.From this point of view, each doctoral student should personally benefit from participating in this collective activity: direct benefit from the work done in relation to the five core propositions; indirect reflection on the themes of other researchers (mutual awareness). The reading seminar is therefore presented as a living interaction between researchers, participating in a community of knowledge. The community explicitly includes the doctoral researchers enrolled in the course, the visiting scholars that will be invited as experts for each of the five core propositions, as well as the academic coordinators.
Content and time frame
The doctoral course consists of 5 three-hour thematic sessions. For this second edition of the seminar, we will have the privilege of welcoming esteemed scholars renowned internationally for their expertise and work in CMS. They will present recent research or books they have published.
| Date & horaire | Contenu |
|---|---|
| 5 mai, 10–13h | Les fondements des approches critiques en management, présentation et discussion menées par Laurent Taskin, avec Julie Hermans, Amélie Jacquemin et Maxence Postaire |
| 12 mai, 10–13h | Critical perspectives in accounting, Jeremy Morales (University of Bristol), discuté par Maxence Postaire |
| 26 mai, 14–17h | Les enjeux des « grand challenge » pour les sciences de gestion, Véronique Perret (Université Paris Dauphine PSL), discutée par Julie Hermans |
| 2 juin, 10–13h | Les anthropologies de la gestion, Jean-François Chanlat (Université Paris Dauphine PSL), discuté par Laurent Taskin |
| 9 juin, 14–17h | Perspectives critiques en entrepreneuriat, Sandrine Le Pontois (Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne), discutée par Amélie Jacquemin |
Learning method
For each session, participants should read the articles mentioned for the session and prepare their contribution to the workshop. This preparation requires writing a summary of the readings associated with the topic (2 pages max.). It should highlight the key insights from the articles and identify clarification points (questions on the content and the meaning assigned by the author), discussion points (in relation to their own understanding, and to other texts) and preliminary take-aways (in relation to their own research design).
After each session, participants are invited to reflect on the take-aways for their own research and to write max. 2 pages about what they have learned, why it is important for them as researchers, and what they would like to change in their research design or in the future by applying those take-aways. A final 2-pages synthesis of the five reflexive pieces, together with a reflection on the interconnectedness of the five propositions and implications for their own doctoral research, should finalize the work of the participant for this doctoral course.
Evaluation methods and criteria
1) Active participation in seminar sessions (50 %, individual)
2) Construction of a portfolio that documents the work done in relation with the doctoral course (50%, individual): a) the preparation before each session (summary 2 pages max),
b) the key learnings after each session (2 pages max per session)
c) a final synthesis about key learnings (2 pages max)
Registration
To apply, simply send an email requesting registration by April 15 to the coordinators (julie.hermans@uclouvain.be; amelie.jacquemin@uclouvain.be; maxence.postaire@uclouvain.be; laurent.taskin@uclouvain.be).
Full Course Description
Workshop : Advertising and Self-Promotion through Images in the Digital Era: Impacts on Consumers
Overview
The ETIC (EffecTs of digital Images on Consumers) project focuses on the negative influences of digital advertising and promotional images on people. lndividuals are analyzed in a dual perspective; as consumers of images on screens, as well as disseminators of images on social media. The aim is to study the consequences of marketing strategies (the attractive and distracting power of images, personification, repeated exposure) on cognitive costs and psychological defense mechanisms, problematic behaviors, negative emotions, and other psychological disorders. The originality of the project lies in the analysis of the similarities and differences in strategies between marketing professionals, and internet users who engage in self-promotion on social media. The purpose of the ETIC project is to define recommendations for reducing these negative effects, in particular through awareness-raising initiatives. This conference addresses two aspects: the impact on consumers of multiple exposure to advertising images, and the impact on consumers of exposure to self-promotional images posted on social media.
Registration
Registration for the event can be completed online, on the project website : https://etic.hypotheses.org/2628 There is a registration fee for this workshop:
- €50 for those who have submitted papers, and PhD students.
- €80 for academics, and professionals.
Registration deadline: September 11, 2026.
PhD Grants
As part of this research day, we try to provide support to PhD students who may encounter funding difficulties at their institutions, but wish to take part in the event. As a result, we offer two €500 PhD grants for their travel and accommodation. These funds are intended to encourage doctoral student participation, maintain a dynamic research environment, and promote academic exchange. You may apply to this grant at the following email address : etic@listes.univ-angers.fr. Registration deadline: May 31, 2026.
Informal research seminar by Marco Daprà
Cooperation beyond Institutions. The Case of the Lodi Model.
Marco M. Daprà, Louvain Research Institute in Management and Organizations
Desirée Del Chiaro, Independent Researcher Pursey Heugens, Rotterdam School of Management
Summary
Institutions underpin the taken-for-granted norms and belief systems that enable cooperation in everyday organizational life. However, what fosters cooperation when institutional frameworks collapse remains insufficiently understood while sustaining cooperation is essential to forming new normative frameworks. This is particularly true in extreme contexts where collective action toward a shared goal becomes imperative. This study investigates these dynamics through an in-depth empirical analysis of Lodi Hospital, the first healthcare institution in the Western world to confront the COVID-19 emergency. Our findings reveal that a shared commitment to an overarching interpretive framework and persistent ethics of care were foundational to enabling cooperation and facilitating a broader organizational paradigm shift. We contribute to the literature on institutional collapse and extreme contexts by showing (1) that cooperation can precede and underpin the reconstruction of institutional norms and (2) that institutional collapse and emergence are heterogeneous processes across institutional orders.
Keywords: Crisis Management, Institutional Theory
Access on Teams
Informal research seminar by Valentine Brognion
Grasping the In-Between: A Dimensional Typology of Interstitial Episodes
Valentine Brognion, Louvain Research Institute in Management and Organizations
Guilhem Bascle, Louvain Research Institute in Management and Organizations
Summary
This conceptual paper explores the micro-spatial configurations of interstitial episodes and their transformative potential at the individual level. Interstitial space is characterized by a place and time of interaction where individuals from different domains interact occasionally and informally around shared activities to which they dedicate a limited amount of time (Furnari, 2014, p. 439). We consider interstitial space at the scale of the interstitial episode, that is, a bounded exposure (time) generating recurring and differentiated interaction patterns specific to a meeting venue (place). Our analysis thus focuses on the micro-spatial description of how exposure to interstitial spaces supports cognitive and relational shifts at the individual level. We broaden the scope of interstitial spaces by developing a dimensional typology that presents systematic variations in the ability of interstitial episodes to cultivate change at the individual level.
Keywords: interstitial space, interstitial episode, spatial affordance, third places, change
Access on Teams
LouRIM seminar series on AI - #2 The art of prompting
This second session of the LouRIM Seminar Series on AI, entitled Responsible AI, follows the first session AI Tools for Research, which was met with great success. In this session, we will explore the challenges related to the responsible, critical, and thoughtful use of artificial intelligence in a research context.
During this 90-minute session, we will explore seven major pillars of AI-related risks. Each topic will be approached through a combination of theoretical explanations, real-world examples, interactive discussions, and, for some themes, games or participatory exercises.
Topics covered will include:
bias and discrimination,
reliability and hallucinations,
transparency and explainability,
privacy and personal data,
societal impacts,
overreliance on AI tools,
good practices for academic research.
The goal of this session is to provide participants with practical guidelines for using AI tools in a more informed and responsible way, while developing a critical understanding of their limitations and potential impacts. Please note that environmental aspects of artificial intelligence will not be covered during this session. This topic will be addressed in a future session of the series.
All resources related to the seminar series are available on the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/cvandekerckh/lourim-ai-seminar-series